Sigmund Freud coined the phrase “Oedipus Complex” based on the Greek
legend of Oedipus and the subsequent plays by Sophocles. The legend
introduces one of the great archetypes in literature as well as
psychology. If nothing else, literature – whether for the page or the
screen – deals with universal archetypal dilemmas placed in
particularistic settings.
Archetypes take us beyond Oedipal predicaments. They lead into
existential predicaments of birth, marriage, divorce, sibling rivalry,
as well as the breakdown of societal and familial taboos.
Steinbeck’s “East of Eden” derives from the story of Cain and Abel and
conveys the terror of sibling rivalry ending in jealous rage and
fratricide. The story of Joseph in Genesis furnishes a powerful
message of paternal favoritism and reconciliation.
Greek mythology often has the intercession of the gods in human
affairs. Classic westerns use the archetype of intercession when the
mysterious stranger arrives in town or at the ranch much like the deux
ex machina of Greek tragedy and helps the downtrodden battle an
implacable foe.
Symbolic death and rebirth themes reminiscent of wisdom literature and
classic myths can be found in “The Blind Side”. The character of
Michael Oher is a cypher, a non-entity abandoned by his mother, one of
the living dead. With the help of a ministering angel he is
resurrected and brought back to productive life.
The list of films highlighting life cycle events seems never ending.
“It’s Complicated” portrays marriage, divorce, resignation, rebirth.
“A Serious Man” explores faith, familial responsibility, delinquent
behavior, academia, mortality, and religion tied to a man who sees his
life and marriage falling apart.
The point of all this is that archetypes and mythology become the gear
in a writer’s tool box that can help create memorable characters and
memorable stories.
As much as we enjoy focusing on archetypes, when developing characters for a screenplay, novel or play, it’s critical to examine all the other issues that make up compelling characters. Archetypes are useful since they present us with valid, and forceful templates that have stood the test of time. However they only work when we understand the principal aspects of the human condition.
Mythology can give us Hercules and Odysseus. Wisdom literature can give us Jesus and Noah.Modern myths gave us Lincoln and John F. Kennedy. How we deal with these myths and archetypes is very dependent on understanding the source of conflict, the opposing forces in a character’s life, motivation, primeval driving forces, and existential crises within the character.
First and foremost, conflict is usually the result of family. Not necessarily family of origin but also the adopted family of a gang, clan or tribe. Real families or surrogate families develop shifting allegiances based on existential crises as well as the emergence of the “secret” in the family. Almost every great story reveals some kind of familial secret that once uncovered become the source of conflict.
Intertwined with conflict almost all characters display at one time or another – often at the same time – independence or a sense of rootlessness, interdependence with others or dependence on others.Independence is the loner character who wishes not to touch or be touched. In America the best examples are seen in westerns with the lone rider entering the town to vanquish the villains and then riding out again, his horse his only ally. Truly independent people (a rare commodity) are cut off from their heritage, their roots and thus not very interesting. That’s one of the reasons we always get the back-story showing the human side, some might say the interdependent side of the character.
Interdependent characters are fairly normal. They show mutual respect for the space of others and believe in the sanctity (in myth, the holiness) of time, place and action. Unfortunately, they’re not too interesting as fodder for fiction since they have all the attributes of ordinary people. However, as stated above, interdependence plays a part in all characters.
Dependent characters present major challenges. They are the ones who bask in the sunlight of others and whose lives are determined by the other. They can be followers, gang supplicants, or be driven into the nether world of psychosis where their personalities are completely subsumed.
In my next blog I’ll identify several motion pictures that exemplify each one of these traits. If you have any favorites, send your analysis to me.
You’re invited to comment.